![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||
|
| |||||||||||||
The following are General Statutes Applicable to Medical Assistance Fraud/Abuse:
It shall be unlawful for any applicant, client or person acting on behalf of such applicant or client to knowingly and willfully and with intent to defraud, conceal or fail to disclose any condition, fact or event affecting such applicant's or client's initial or continued entitlement to receive assistance under this part.
It is unlawful for any person knowingly, willingly, and with intent to defraud, to obtain or attempt to obtain, or to assist, aid, or abet another person, either directly or indirectly, to obtain money, services, or any other thing of value to which the person is not entitled as a client under this Part, or otherwise to deliberately misuse a Medicaid identification card. This misuse includes the sale, alteration, or lending of the Medicaid identification card to others for services and the use of the card by someone other than the client to receive or attempt to receive Medicaid program coverage for services rendered to that individual.
Proof of intent to defraud does not require proof of intent to defraud any particular person. A person who violates a provision of this section shall be guilty of a Class I felony if the value of the assistance wrongfully obtained is more than four hundred dollars ($400.00).
A person who violates a provision of this section shall be guilty of a Class I misdemeanor if the value of the assistance wrongfully obtained is four hundred dollars ($400.00) or less.
For the purposes of this section the word "person" includes any natural person, association, consortium, corporation, body politic, partnership, or the group, entity or organization.
REISSUED 07/01/08 - CHANGE NO 16-08
(III.B.)
If any person shall knowingly and designedly by means of any kind of false pretense whatsoever, whether the false pretenses of a past or subsisting fact or of a future fulfillment or event, obtains or attempts to obtain from any person within this state any money, goods, property, services, chose in action, or any thing of value with intent to cheat or defraud any person of such money, goods property, services, chose in action or other thing of value, such person shall be guilty of a felony.
Provided, that if, on the trial of anyone indicted for such crime, it shall be provided that he obtained the property in such manner as to amount to larceny or embezzlement, the jury shall have submitted to them such other felony proved; and no person tried for such felony shall be liable to be afterwards prosecuted for larceny or embezzlement upon the same facts:
Provided further that it shall be sufficient in any indictment for obtaining or attempting to obtain any such money, goods, property, services, chose in action, or other thing of value by false pretenses to allege that the party accused did the act with intent to defraud, without alleging an intent to defraud any particular person, and without alleging an intent to defraud any particular person, and without alleging any ownership of the money, goods, property, services, chose in action or other thing of value; and upon the trial of any such indictment, it shall not be necessary to prove either an intent to defraud any particular person or that the person to whom the false pretense was made was the person defrauded, but it shall be sufficient to allege and prove that the party accused made the false pretense charged with an intent to defraud. If the value of the money, goods, property, services, chose in action, or other thing of value is one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) or more, a violation of this section is a Class C felony. If the value of the money, goods, property, services, chose in action, or other thing of value is less than one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000), a violation of this section is a Class H felony.
Evidence of non-fulfillment of a contract obligation standing alone shall not establish the essential element of intent to defraud.
When referring cases for prosecution in either criminal or civil court, the county dss must be aware of the statutes of limitations that apply to these cases. These statutes affect the amount of overpayment presented in court and the specific charges brought against the client.
REISSUED 07/01/08 - CHANGE NO 16-08
(III.C.)
Therefore, in cases involving overpayments made prior to July 1, 1977, if a recertification period began prior to July 1, 1977, and continued after that date, that specific recertification period would not be prosecutable in criminal court regardless of the amount as the statute of limitations has expired.
NOTE: If the client has signed a repayment agreement containing the word "Seal" next to the signature, the civil statute of limitations for enforcement of collection is ten years from the date the document was signed. However, the client must circle the word “Seal.” The investigator should contact the county attorney for further information regarding this point.
REISSUED 07/01/08 - CHANGE NO 16-08
(III.D.)
Source: As re-designated, 44 FR 17926 (March 23, 1979) and amended at 51 FR 7178 (February 28, 1986, effective May 29, 1986)
A State Plan must provide, under a State statute that imposes legal sanctions, safeguards meeting the requirements of this subpart that restrict the use or disclosure of information concerning clients to purposes directly connected with the administration of the plan.
Source: As re-designated, 44 FR 17926 (March 23, 1979)
Source: As re-designated, 44 FR 17926 (March 23, 1979)
The Medicaid agency must have authority to implement and enforce the provisions specified in this subpart for safeguarding information about clients.
Source: As re-designated, 44 FR 17926 (March 23, 1979)
REISSUED 07/01/08 - CHANGE NO 16-08
(III.D.)
The agency must publicize provisions governing the confidential nature of information about clients, including legal sanctions imposed for improper disclosure and use.
The agency must provide copies of these provisions to clients and to other persons and agencies to which information is disclosed.
Source: As re-designated, 44 FR 17926 (March 23, 1979)
The agency must have criteria that govern the types of information about clients that are safeguarded. This information must include at least:
The Privacy Act permits an individual to have some control over the accuracy and disclosures of records maintained by Federal Agencies. However the Privacy Act of 1947 (P.L. 93-579) Section 552b (7) allows a fraud investigator to obtain information necessary to conduct a civil or criminal investigation.
The client and legal counsel have the legal right to view and have a copy of the information in the eligibility or services record at anytime with the exception of:
REISSUED 07/01/08 - CHANGE NO 16-08
(III.D.9.)
|
For questions or clarification on any of the policy contained in these manuals, please contact your local county office. |